Request sought police incident report and a corresponding audio and video recording. Act 22 removes the OOR's jurisdiction as to video recordings in the possession of law enforcement agencies. Agency proved that only one responsive record exists within its possession, custody or control however did not provide the record based on previously providing the same record to the Requester. Agency proved that some information in the responsive record is protected by information identifying minors, and that other information is protected by the constitutional right to privacy. Granted in part, denied in part and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in part.