Docket Sheet

Tom Murse and LNP | LancasterOnline v. Lancaster County

OOR Dkt. No.: AP 2022-0923
Case Status: Partially Granted/Partially Denied



Higgins, Kathleen


Request sought communications regarding the handling of media inquiries. Agency proved that certain records are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Agency proved that certain records reflect internal, predecisional deliberations. Agency proved that certain records are exempt drafts of policy. Agency proved that some records are exempt records relating to an agency employee. Granted in part and denied in part.

Clause Exemption Result
708 (b) (10) (i) A record that reflects: (A) The internal, predecisional deliberations of an agency, its members, employees or officials or predecisional deliberations between agency members, employees or officials and members, employees or officials of another agency
708 (b) (7) The following records relating to an agency employee: (i) A letter of reference or recommendation pertaining to the character or qualifications of an identifiable individual, unless it was prepared in relation to the appointment of an individual to fill a
708 (b) (9) The draft of a bill, resolution, regulation, statement of policy, management directive, ordinance or amendment thereto prepared by or for an agency.
Agency Invoked an Extension The agency invoked a 30 day extension to respond to the request.
Exempt under Attorney-Client Privilege Exempt under Attorney-Client Privilege
Requester Granted Extension to OOR The requester granted the OOR a 30, 60, or 90 day extension to issue a final determination in the appeal.
Docket Entries
Filed Description Step Court Document
08/19/2022 OOR Final Determination Final Determination
Print Docket Sheet