Final Determination Record

Segelbaum v. York County

OOR Dkt. No.: AP 2018-2006
Case Status: Partially Granted

York

Request sought communications between the County and its solicitor. Agency proved that certain records are protected by the attorney-client privilege, but the Agency did not prove that the records are internal, predecisional and deliberative or exempt as appraisals.

  • Section 708(b)(10) - Internal, predecisional deliberations and strategy.
  • Section 708(b)(10)(ii) Subparagraph (i)(A) shall apply to agencies subject to 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 7 (relating to open meetings) in a manner consistent with 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 7. A record which is not otherwise exempt from access under this act and which is presented to a quorum for deliberation in accordance with 65 Pa.C.S. Ch. 7 shall be a public record.
  • Section 708(b)(10)(iii) This paragraph shall not apply to a written or Internet application or other document that has been submitted to request Commonwealth funds.
  • Section 708(b)(10)(iv) This paragraph shall not apply to the results of public opinion surveys, polls, focus groups, marketing research or similar effort designed to measure public opinion.
  • Section 708(b)(22) - Contents of appraisals, reviews, and audits pertaining to real estate
  • Section 708(b)(22)(ii) This paragraph shall not apply once the decision is made to proceed with the lease, acquisition or disposal of real property or an interest in real property or the purchase of public supply or construction project.
  • Exempt under Attorney-Client Privilege
  • The agency invoked a 30 day extension to respond to the request.

Filings Received by OOR
Filed Adjudicator Description or File Name Document
02/11/2019 2018-2006_YorkDailyRecord (Segelbaum)-YorkCounty_FD.pdf