Docket Sheet

George Bochetto and Bochetto & Lentz, P.C. v. Pittsburgh City

OOR Dkt. No.: AP 2020-2555
Case Status: Partially Granted/Partially Denied

01/21/2021

12/18/2020

Burlew, Erin

Allegheny

Request sought records related to the removal of the Columbus statue. Agency provided one record on appeal. The Request may not be modified on appeal and the agency's interpretation was reasonable. The Request was sufficiently specific so the agency needs to perform a further search. Records are protected by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work-product doctrine. Records are exempt under Sections 708(b)(10) and (b)(17) of the RTKL. Granted in part, denied in part and dismissed as moot in part.

Clause Exemption Result
708 (b) (10) (i) A record that reflects: (A) The internal, predecisional deliberations of an agency, its members, employees or officials or predecisional deliberations between agency members, employees or officials and members, employees or officials of another agency Denied
708 (b) (17) A record of an agency relating to a noncriminal investigation, including: (i) Complaints submitted to an agency. (ii) Investigative materials, notes, correspondence and reports. (iii) A record that includes the identity of a confidential source, including Denied
Agency Invoked an Extension The agency invoked a 30 day extension to respond to the request.
Dismissed as moot Dismissed as moot
Exempt as Attorney Work Product Exempt as Attorney Work Product Denied
Exempt under Attorney-Client Privilege Exempt under Attorney-Client Privilege Denied
Section 703 - Specificity Section 703 - Specificity Granted
Docket Entries
Filed Description Step Court Document
01/21/2021 OOR Final Determination Final Determination
Print Docket Sheet