Act 22 of 2017 (specifically, Chapter 67A of the Act) established a new process for requesting audio and video recordings in the possession of law enforcement agencies in Pennsylvania.
Act 22 applies to individuals seeking "any audio recording or video recording made by a law enforcement agency." The Right-to-Know Law does not apply to requests for these recordings.
Act 22 defines "law enforcement agency" as:
A "law enforcement officer" includes "an officer of the United States, the Commonwealth or a political subdivision thereof, another state or political subdivision thereof or who is empowered by law to conduct investigations of or to make arrests for offenses enumerated in this chapter or an equivalent crime in another jurisdiction, a sheriff or deputy sheriff and any attorney authorized by law to prosecute or participate in the prosecution of the offense."
Under Act 22, a request for an audio or video recording in the possession of a law enforcement agency must be made within 60 days of the date the recording was made. Requests must be submitted via personal delivery or certified mail (§67A03).
A written request must be submitted to the Agency Open Records Officer (AORO) for the law enforcement agency that possesses the record. The request is not officially received until it is personally delivered to the AORO, or when it is marked as "delivered" by certified mail.
The request must include:
Once a request is filed, the agency has 30 days to respond, although the requester and agency can agree to an extension.
The OOR has developed this request form for police recordings (also available as a Word file) to help ensure that requesters include all of the required information.
An agency may review the request itself. However, if the agency has a memorandum of understanding with either a District Attorney's Office or the Attorney General's Office, an attorney from one of those offices may review the request and decide if the recording will be released.
Under Act 22, the agency may deny the request – in writing – if it determines that a recording contains:
The agency can charge "reasonable fees," which are not defined in the law, to provide a copy of the recording.
When a request is denied, the requester may appeal within 30 days of the date of denial to the Court of Common Pleas with jurisdiction over the matter (i.e., the court in the county where the recorded event took place).
This appeal is filed as a Petition for Judicial Review and must include:
If the event recorded took place inside a residence, the petitioner must also certify that notice of the petition has been served on each individual present at the time of the recording, and on the owner and occupant of the residence, unless that information is unknown and not reasonably ascertainable.
In all cases, service is effective upon receipt from personal delivery or certified mail with proof of service.
If a requester does not receive either a grant or a written denial after 30 days, and they have not agreed to an extension of time for review, their request is "deemed denied." At that point, the requester can appeal the denial.
The agency's time for review does not begin until the AORO receives the request.
Nothing in Act 22 precludes a law enforcement agency or a prosecuting attorney with jurisdiction from choosing to release an audio or video recording, with or without a written request.
Note: If the prosecuting attorney determines that a recording contains potential evidence in a criminal matter, information pertaining to an investigation, confidential information or victim information – and reasonable redaction of the recording will not safeguard the potential evidence or information – then the law enforcement agency can only release the recording with the written permission of the prosecuting attorney.
The Office of Open Records ("OOR") does not hear appeals from agencies under Act 22. If such an appeal is filed with the OOR, the appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
