Docket Sheet

Thomas Coyne v. Scranton City

OOR Dkt. No.: AP 2025-3729
Case Status: Partially Denied: Partially Moot

03/02/2026

01/06/2026

Quadri, Tope L.

Lackawanna

The Requests sought information about vacant board positions, and records of any actions noted or taken by the City in relation to the enforcement and prosecution of a specified City ordinance. The City provided access to data responsive to Request 1 on appeal. Request 1 cannot be modified or expanded on appeal. The City has demonstrated that additional records responsive to Request 1 do not exist in its possession, custody or control. Request 2 is insufficiently specific. Denied in part; dismissed as moot in part.

Clause Exemption Result
Agency Invoked an Extension The agency invoked a 30 day extension to respond to the request.
Dismissed as moot Dismissed as moot
Mediation Requested Mediation Requested
Not in Possession, Custody, or Control of Agency Not in Possession, Custody, or Control of Agency Denied
Requester Granted Extension to OOR The requester granted the OOR a 30, 60, or 90 day extension to issue a final determination in the appeal.
Section 703 - Specificity Section 703 - Specificity Denied
2025-3730 Thomas Coyne v. Scranton City
Docket Entries
Filed Description Step Court Document
02/24/2026 OOR Final Determination Final Determination
Print Docket Sheet