Docket Sheet

Thomas Coyne v. Scranton City

OOR Dkt. No.: AP 2025-3730
Case Status: Consolidated
This Appeal has been consolidated into OOR Dkt. No.: AP 2025-3729.

03/02/2026

01/06/2026

Quadri, Tope L.

Lackawanna

The Requests sought information about vacant board positions, and records of any actions noted or taken by the City in relation to the enforcement and prosecution of a specified City ordinance. The City provided access to data responsive to Request 1 on appeal. Request 1 cannot be modified or expanded on appeal. The City has demonstrated that additional records responsive to Request 1 do not exist in its possession, custody or control. Request 2 is insufficiently specific. Denied in part; dismissed as moot in part.

Clause Exemption Result
Agency Invoked an Extension The agency invoked a 30 day extension to respond to the request.
Consolidated Consolidated
Mediation Requested Mediation Requested
Requester Granted Extension to OOR The requester granted the OOR a 30, 60, or 90 day extension to issue a final determination in the appeal.
2025-3729 Thomas Coyne v. Scranton City
Docket Entries
No Docket Entries